原文：「Die Verursacher der Corona-Krise sind eindeutig identifiziert: VIROLOGEN」(PDF)

英訳：「The Initiators of the Corona Crisis Have Been Clearly Identified VIROLOGISTS」（PDF）

邦訳：「ウイルス学者」（PDF）

• 日本語テキスト

The Initiators of the Corona Crisis Have Been Clearly Identified

who claim the existence of disease-causing viruses are committing scientific fraud and must be prosecuted

Science and the scientific method are important tools  that  help  to  identify  and  solve  challenges. Science has very clear rules: Claims must be proven  -  they  must  be  transparent,  comprehensible and verifiable. Only statements that are verifiable may be called scientific, everything else falls within the realm of faith. Matters of faith must not be presented as scientifically proven facts to derive or justify governmental measures.

Scientific  statements  must  be  refutable,  falsifiable in order to claim them as scientific. the first prescribed  duty  of  every  scientist  is  to  strictly check his own statements and try to refute them. Once refutation is unsuccessful and the failure of this is clearly documented through control experiments, a statement can then be called scientific.

All corona measures issued by governments and authorities are ultimately regulated by law, in Germany the infection Protection Act (ifSG). The law gives them the appearance of legitimacy but does not provide justification. With § 1 ifSG, for example, the legal framework is intended to subject the population to the rules of science. The most important rule of science is the documented and unsuccessful attempts to refute the statement which has been presented as true and scientific. All scientific rules require compliance with the laws of reasoning and logic. If these rules are disregarded or violated, the scientific statement is as equally refuted as if by a control experiment that shows the statement to be wrong.

It  is  clear  from  the  choice  of  words  in  all  publications on all pathogenic viruses that virologists not  only  violated  the  laws  of  reason,  logic  and binding principles of science, but they have even refuted the very existence of pathogenic viruses. Taking off the hypnotic spectacles of fear, reading objectively what the authors have written, any interested  person  able  to  understand  english  who has  acquired  an  understanding  of  the  methods used,  will  discover  that  virologists  have  misinterpreted  normally  occurring  gene  sequences  as viral components and by doing so have disproved their whole field of expertise. (NB this confusion doesn’t extend however, to the virologists who are studying  phages  and  phage-like,  so-called  giant viruses.)  in  the  case  of  claims  for  the  existence of  alleged  SArS-CoV-2  virus,  this  is  particularly transparent.

As  fundamental  scientific  requirements  have  all been violated by those working within the field of virology  this  can  only  be  described  as  scientific fraud. Science fraud never falls within any current remit  in  criminal  law  and  so  far  there  has  been no precedent for it to do so. By pretending to act scientifically but in actual fact acting unscientifically, virologists commit the fraud of not fulfilling the  work  they  were  employed  to  do,  in  German law,  “Anstellungsbetrüger”. The relevant governmental  departments  are  called  upon  to  prosecute  the  fraudulent  pseudoscientists  in  order  to prevent  them  from  continuing  to  carry  out  their anti-scientific,  anti-social  and  dangerous  activities.  As  soon  as  a  first  court  of  law  establishes the facts outlined in this article and convicts the first  virologist  of  fraud,  this  will  bring  about  the end of the global corona crisis, judicially sealed, a chance for all.


Humanity is facing a great challenge: the disciplines of biology and medicine have created a self-reinforcing momentum, the consequences of fear and an anti-life outlook. These interfere with and destroy the environment, plants, animals, people and the economy. The corona crisis is only the visible tip of an iceberg on a collision course with everyone and everything. One of the reasons for this challenge is materialism, the attempt to explain life with purely material models. Our present day materialism is the product of “post-socratic” antiquity, an explicit counter-reaction to fear and abuse of power by religions. This was an understandable, very human reaction, motivated by a humanitarian principle, but it has dramatic consequences. The materialist philosophy has brought with it a good/ evil dichotomy in biology, on which the prevailing opinion in western medicine medicine is based - with the resulting anti-life treatment approaches: antibiotics, radiation, chemotherapy, disinfection, restriction of basic rights, vaccination, lock-down, quarantine, social distancing etc and so on. Ever increasing numbers of people and the environment and economy are harmed by this ideology. This materialistic good/evil theory which has no factual basis but has evolved from disproved assumptions, developed quietly into the most powerful religion.

The materialistic theory of life states that there are only atoms but no consciousness, no spiritual forces and no animator who could have created them and set them in motion. In order to be able to explain the cosmos and life in a purely material way, our “science” has been forced to claim a huge bang, during which all of these atoms were supposedly created out of nothing and then flew apart. It is assumed that a few of these atoms formed molecules through accidentally  banging  into  one  another. These  molecules  supposedly formed a primordial cell by a random coming together, from which  all  further  life  is  alleged  to  have  developed  through struggle and selection. All this is said to have happened in the  distant  past,  taking  unimaginable  lengths  of  time,  and cannot therefore be subjected to scientific examination. This narrative cannot be called scientific.

Leaving aside theoretical physics with its quantum theories, which  imagines  this  mindset  with  ever-increasing  capital investment  into  the  ever  smaller.  For  a  clearer  view  of  life that can be easily understood by conducting simple experiments, I would like to point out the very substance of which life consists: the membrane of water, the so-called surface tension membrane which is formed by water wherever it has contact with other substances and whenever it is in swirling, spiral motion. Aristotle called this substance ‘ether’ and later Dr. Peter Augustin discovered it and called it the ‘primary substance.’ Japanese plant physiologists referred to this substance as Pi-water. This rediscovery of ether/primordial substance  permits  the  pre-Socratic  principle  to  be  revived and discussed - ‘as in the larger, so in the smaller.’
Thinking in  terms  of  atomic  theory  impedes  this  kind  of  perception and brings about incorrect assumptions. The entire academic conceptual world of biology and medicine is based on this spurious notion.

In  1848,  when  constructive  possibilities  inspired  by  the French revolution had a chance to also influence Germany, radical change failed and caused a dramatic hardening and deterioration of political and social life. The person responsible for the pivotal developments in biology and medicine as we know it today was in 1848, advocating humane, logical and correct measures for the prevention of epidemics. Over the course of the following 10 years however, his thinking conformed to the hardening and increasingly extreme political conditions. We are talking about rudolf Virchow who in 1858 without any scientific basis, exclusively inspired by the atomic theory of theory of Democritus and epicurus, postulated the Cellular theory of life and all diseases, namely Cellular Pathology.

Throughout  his  life,  rudolf  Virchow  suppressed  relevant facts of embryology and tissue histology in order to be able to  present  and  popularise  his  new  cell  theory  as  factual. Embryology and histology - the germ theory of life, however, is an indispensable prerequisite for understanding life, its development and, above all, illnesses, healing, healing crises and obstacles to healing.

Rudolf  Virchow  claimed,  analogous  to  the  atomic  theory, that all life originated from a cell.
The cell was alleged to be the smallest, indivisible unit of life, which nevertheless was also supposed to generate all diseases through the production of alleged disease toxins, in Latin, ‘virus.’
This laid the foundation from which the gene-, infection-, immune- and cancer theories necessarily had to develop if the processes of life, disease and healing were to be explained within this  theory.    
If  it  is  to  be  believed  that  all  processes  are only caused by material interactions and that all life arises from a cell, adherents to this view are forced to maintain a structural and functional design of life, i.e. a hereditary substance, and to claim this as fact.

The same forced logic arises for the claimed disease toxins: the  cell  allegedly  produces  viruses  (disease-causing  poisons)  and  spreads  these  inside  and  outside  the  body.  In order for this to be true, a place within the individual must be claimed where this virus was first created. Once this way of thinking is elevated to dogma to the exclusion of any other  teaching,  and  other  points  of  view  are  defamed  as  unscientific or conspiracy against the state, it precludes from the  outset,  other  ways  of  thinking  and  considering  of  the origin of diseases. This forced logic only ever seeks causes in material defects or material malignancy. It conceals the fact that the idea of the virus as a disease toxin had already been  scientifically  refuted  and  abandoned  in  1951,  which meant that in 1952 another idea had to be invented: Viruses as a collection of dangerous genes. However, there is  still  no  viable  scientific  proof  for  this  assumption.  The good news is that genetic virology, which became popular from 1954 onwards, has scientifically refuted itself through its own statements. I can testify that this statement is 100% correct and verified. I will stand by it as a virologist, a scientist, citizen and as a human being.

As it is still claimed that dangerous bacterial protein toxins exist in the body, the idea of disease toxins is still quite potent. Also claimed to be dangerous are bacteria such as the supposedly dangerous corkscrew bacteria, which allegedly drills its way from a presumed point of entry via the nerves into the brain. What virologists, physicians and science journalists fail to mention is that the theory of viruses as protein toxins had to be abandoned in 1951. That year, two control experiments were carried out in order to test the toxin virus theory:

1. Rather than only exposing tissues supposedly damaged by viruses, healthy tissues were also exposed to putrefaction.  It  was  found  that  the  proteins  produced  by  the  decomposition of healthy tissue were the same as those produced  by  the  decomposition  of  “virus-damaged”  tissue. This disproved the virus assumption.
2. On top of this, the pre1951 theory of what a virus is supposed to be was refuted by the fact that no one could ever find or photograph anything different in people or animals supposedly infected with a virus from what can be found or photographed  in  healthy  subjects,  using  the  electron  microscope.This is still the case today.

Virology disproved itself with these successful control experiments  and  nullified  itself,  however  this  was  only  noticed  by  attentive  readers  of  professional  journals.  The ongoing vaccination campaigns continued to be celebrated and promoted by the manipulators of power therefore the mass  media  suppressed  this  news.  The  vaccination  campaigns were not stopped even though disease-toxin viruses as justification were no longer valid. This was additionally due to the silence of the health authorities and the scientific community.
After virology had invalidated itself, biology and medicine did not yet propose any other explanation for what had previously been defined as viral outbreaks within the purely material cell theory.

Therefore, a new theory regarding the nature of viruses had to be devised. Those involved modelled their thinking on factually existing structures called phages. These are formed by bacteria when they are removed from their milieu and their vital exchange with other bacteria and microbes is inhibited.  
When I was a young student, I was lucky enough to isolate such a structure from the sea and study its structure, composition and its interaction with the environment. This led me directly into the field of virology, as I innocently assumed that I had discovered a harmless virus/stable virus-host relationship which might therefore enable me to study the origin of viruses. Thirty years on, new examples of these structures now referred to as “giant viruses” have continued to be discovered and what’s more, it has been clearly proven that these structures stand at the beginning of the processes with which biological life begins.Some researchers presently consider these structures to be part of the fourth kingdom of life along with the primordial bacteria, the bacteria and the eukaryotes.

These structures known as phages and also as ‘giant viruses’ are erroneously considered to eat bacteria. They can be described as a type of spore that bacteria and simple organisms form when their living conditions change in such a way that they can no longer optimally reproduce or survive. This type of helpful structure always consists of a strand of the so-called hereditary substance DNA which is always exactly the same length and of exactly the same composition. This type of DNA is always enclosed with a membrane of the dense material from which biological life emerges. That is  why  phages  or  ‘giant  viruses’  -  let  us  better  call  them bionts - are easy to isolate - i.e. to cultivate and separate from all the other parts of life.
In this isolated form, they are  routinely  analysed  biochemically.  Every  biochemical characterisation  reveals  that  the  nucleic  acid  of  a  phage/giant virus is always exactly the same length and always has exactly the same composition.

Indeed,  for  decades  phages  were  the  only  source  of  pure nucleic acid (DNA) in biochemical studies.
The process of uptake  into  and  release  from  bacteria,  documented  under the electron microscope, was interpreted as infection. Without  any  evidence  it  was  claimed  that  phages  attack bacteria, rape them, force their nucleic acid on them and that the bacteria die as a result. In reality, the situation is quite different.  
Only bacteria that are extremely inbred, i.e. constantly propagated without contact with other bacteria or microbes, transform into phages in an act of metamorphosis. This transformation is misinterpreted as the death of  the  bacteria  caused  by  phages.  Whereas  bacteria  that are  isolated  from  their  environment  never  transform  into phages  and  do  not  die  when  phages  are  applied  to  them in any quantity.
This is also the reason why the often cited Phage therapy as a substitute for antibiotics, for example to suppress pain and other symptoms - as with any other poisoning - will never work in the intended sense.

In the case of the alga (ectocarpus siliculosus) from which I isolated its “giant viruses”, the situation is such: the mobile  parts  of  the  alga,  the  gametes  and  spores,  search  for the  “giant  viruses”  in  their  environment  with  their  mobile flagella and absorb them. During this process, the growing algae integrate the nucleic acid of the “giant viruses” into their own chromosomes. It has been observed that the algae which contain the “giant viruses” fare better than those which don’t. It has also never been observed that algae with “giant viruses” are worse off than those without. New and ever  more  remarkable  “giant  viruses”  with  ever  more  impressive properties are constantly being found, and increasing evidence is being found to demonstrate that bacteria and microorganisms, amoebae and unicellular organisms evolve from “giant viruses,” into which they transform again when their living conditions are no longer optimal.

‘Giant  viruses’  are  naturally  created  by  and  around  nucleic acids. These nucleic acids develop catalytic activities, i.e.  they  independently  release  energy,  synthesise  further nucleic acids, other molecules and substances and thereby constantly generate new properties and abilities. The highly reactive and diverse nucleic acid forms of rNA [see term rNA  world’]  which  can  easily  and  constantly  change  into DNA and change back again, also arise in the process of the self-organisation  of  life,  without  any  scientifically  comprehensible reason or cause. Biological life that is visible to us is quite obviously materialising out of the water. An increasing number of cellular microorganisms are being found whose genome consists largely of the nucleic acids of “giant viruses.” With the discovery of phages - only ever produced by the transformation  of  extremely  inbred  (incestuous)  bacterial cultures, giant viruses, which maintain, enlarge and actively metabolise themselves, and the discovery of new organisms composed  of  giant  viruses,  three  things  have  been  proven so far:

1. the theory inherent in Cell theory that biological life only exists in the form of cells and only arises from cells has been disproved.
2. The assertion that biological life arose in primordial times once and for all has been disproved.If we look at life objectively and unrestricted by dogmas and baseless theories we can see that life is constantly emerging anew and before our eyes.It has been proven that biological life, as we now know it, can arise wherever water is present and perhaps even create the conditions that are the same or similar to those on our planet.
3. The false interpretation, viewing the absorption of nucleic acids from “phages” and “giant viruses” into other organisms as an infection and harmful, has been disproved.

This false  interpretation  made  from  1952  onwards  was  the  reason for believing that there were genetic viruses in humans which, by transmitting their “dangerous” nucleic acids, produced diseases and were responsible for death and destruction. To date, no virus has been observed in or isolated from any human being, animal, plant or their fluids. To date, not even one nucleic acid has been isolated that corresponds to the length and composition of the genetic strands of the alleged disease-causing viruses. This is despite the most basic standard techniques being long available for isolation, presentation and analysis of the composition of nucleic acids of this length.

In isolated form, “phages” and “giant viruses” (bionts) can be photographed quickly and easily in large numbers using the electron microscope. This alone documents the degree of purity. However, the isolation and photographing of isolated and characterised structures has not yet been successful for any of the claimed disease-causing viruses! In the course of scientific investigations bionts are regularly seen and photographed in large numbers in the organisms in which they are produced, the organisms that give rise to them. Conversely, there is no successful documentation of so-called pathogenic viruses from any human, other animal, plant or fluid using the electron microscope. Why is this not the case?

The  electron  photographs  of  alleged  viruses  simply  show structures  that  can  always  also  be  obtained  from  other sources. These structures have never been isolated or biochemically  characterised,  this  is  very  easily  verifiable  from the  scientific  papers.  These  photographed  structures  have never been used as the source from which short pieces of nucleic acid are taken and from which virologists THEORETICALLY construct the long nucleic acid, passed off as the alleged genetic strand of a virus.

Exactly  the  same  length  and  exactly  the  same  composition of nucleic acids from all types of ‘phages’ and ‘giant viruses’ can be obtained every time. Yet, it has never been possible to isolate a nucleic acid (DNA or rNA) from a structure or from a bodily fluid with a length and composition that corresponds to what is claimed to be the genetic strand of a pathogenic virus.

Looking at what happened between 1951 and 10.12.54 we can see how and why virology completely lost its way and ended up with a thoroughly dangerous and unscientific approach totally removed from reality. After medical virology was ended  by  control  experiments  in  1951,  from  1952  onwards  the structure  of  the  phage  became  the  model  of  how  a  ‘virus’ would present itself. The stubbornly persistent ideology of ‘disease-causing viruses’ simply continued in changed form: a nucleic acid of a certain length and composition, surrounded by a covering consisting of a certain number of certain proteins.

However: in the absence of electron microscope images of “disease-causing  viruses”  in  humans/animals/plants,  and lack  of  said  images  in  isolated  form,  indeed  without  biochemical  characterisation  or  isolation,  virologists  continue to be compelled to theoretically assemble separate components from supposedly “virally” diseased tissue into viruses and to present these invented products to themselves and to the public as factually existing viruses!

The virologists who maintain the existence of disease-causing  viruses  refer  to  a  single  publication  [translator’s  note: https://pubmedinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/propagation-in-tissue-cultures-of-cytopathogenic-agents-from-patients-with-measles.pdf]  to  justify  their  actions  and  pass them off as science, this is easily recognisable as mind-bogglingly  unscientific. The  papers  published  on  the  1st  June 1954 explicitly describe the authors’ observations as speculations and that these speculations would need verification in the future. On the 10th December 1954 the lead author of the study, John Franklin enders received the Nobel Prize for a different speculation within the old “viruses are dangerous protein toxins” theory (refuted in 1951!), and this Nobel Prize achieved  two  things:  the  old,  disproved  toxin-virus  theory was given a pseudo-scientific halo and the new genetic-virology was given the highest, supposed scientific honour.  This in  turn  made  sure  that  verification  of  the  aforementioned measles publication never took place.

The new genetic virology from 1952 onwards has two erroneous foundations: that disease-causing viruses are in principle structured like phages and arise when cells die in the test tube after supposedly infected sample material is added. Enders and his colleagues put forward the notion in their publication on 1.6.1954 that cells which die in the test tube after the addition of supposedly infected material would be transformed into viruses.

This  die-off  is  passed  off  as  the  isolation  of  the  virus  -  as it is assumed that whatever has created the changes MUST have come from the outside. At the same time this dying cell mass is used as a vaccine.
Enders, his colleagues and indeed everyone else have overlooked - dazzled by the Nobel Prize - that the death of cells in the laboratory is not induced by a virus. Rather, the cells in the laboratory are systematically and unintentionally killed without anyone realising that this is  what  they  are  doing!  The  cells  are  killed  with  cell-toxic antibiotics, through extreme starvation by withdrawing the nutrient solution and through the addition of decomposing proteins that release toxic metabolic products.

Components from cells dying in the laboratory setting in this way are to this day theoretically put together to form a virus and passed off as reality. Virology of disease-causing viruses is as simple as that. Neither Enders nor other virologists have ever carried out the control experiments to “infect” the cells with sterile material.
The cells die in the control experiment in exactly the same way as with supposedly “viral” material.

Error and self-deception are human, understandable and excusable.  What is not excusable is the constant assertions by virologists that what they say and do is scientific. This is clearly false, easily demonstrable and understandable to everyone. Therefore, virologists who claim the existence of corona viruses or other disease-causing viruses must be called “Anstellungsbetrüger”  and  prosecuted  by  the  rule  of  law  to  retract  their false, disproven and dangerous statements. Thus, the Corona crisis and other “viral” catastrophes with resulting deadly consequences such as “AiDS”, “ebola” and other baseless “viral” pandemics can and will not only be stopped, prevented in the future, but also turned into an opportunity for all.

The  definition  of  what  may  be  called  a  scientific  statement and the resulting obligations are clearly defined. In summary:

A. Every scientific claim must be verifiable, comprehensible and refutable.

B. A scientific statement may only be called scientific when it cannot be refuted by the laws of logic and where applicable, through control experiments.

C. Every scientist is obliged to check and question his own statements.

Since virologists have never verified their statements themselves and are reluctant to do so for understandable reasons - who would want to disprove themselves, their actions, their reputations?  -  we  will  do  so  with  seven  arguments.  Each individual  argument  will  be  sufficient  on  its  own  to  refute the  existence  of  all  pathogenic  viruses  and  the  work  of  virologists (excluding researchers who deal with the existing phages and giant viruses). In the following points, the word “virus” is used instead of the phrase “pathogenic virus.”

Virologists have never isolated a complete hereditary strand of a virus and shown it directly, in its entire length. They only ever use very short pieces of nucleic acids, whose succession of four molecules they determine and then refer to as a sequence. From a multitude of millions of very short sequences determined in this way, virologists theoretically assemble a fictitious long strand of genetic material with the help of elaborate computational and statistical methods. They call this process alignment.

The result of the complex alignment, the fictitious and very long strand of genetic material, is declared by virologists as proof of the existence of a virus. However, such a completed strand never appears in reality or in the scientific literature, despite the standard techniques having been long been available for determining the length and composition of any nucleic acids. By using alignment process instead of presenting a correspondingly long nucleic acid directly, virologists have disproved their own work.

Virologists  have  never  used  very  short  nucleic  acids  from control experiments to perform and document alignment. In order to do this, they would have to isolate short nucleic acids with the exact same cell culture procedure. The difference being that the so-called infection is not through addition of supposedly infected samples but with with sterile materials.

These logical and mandatory control experiments have never been carried out and documented. With this alone, the virologists have proven that their statements have no scientific value and may NOT be passed off as scientific statements.

In order to be able to theoretically/computationally assemble  the  very  short  sequences  of  nucleic  acids  into  a  long genome, virologists use a template to align these short sequences  into  a  very  long,  supposedly  viral  genome  strand. Without such a predefined, very long sequence template, no virologist is able to theoretically /computationally  create  a viral genome strand.

Virologists  argue  that  the  theoretically/  computationally constructed  genome  strand  originates  from  a  virus  because the  alignment  was  carried  out  by  means  of  yet  another,  predefined viral genome strand.
This logic is clearly and unambiguously  refuted  since  all  templates  were  themselves exclusively generated by theoretical/computation and do not originate from a virus.

Virologists  claim  that  infectious,  i.e.  intact  viruses  are  in large  numbers  in  blood  and  saliva.  
That  is  why  in  the  Corona crisis, everyone is supposed to wear a mask. To date, however, not a single virus has been photographed in saliva, blood or elsewhere in humans/animals/plants or their fluids, even  though  electron  microscope  images  are  now  an  easy and routinely performed standard technique.

Something  that  has  never  been  seen  in  humans/animals/plants or fluids from them must not be passed off as a scientifically proven fact.

There are two different techniques that are used to produce photographs of alleged viruses. In order to order to use transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cell cultures need to be embedded in resin and sliced into thin layers so that it’s possible to see through them. Particles that they show in these images have never been isolated and neither has their composition been biochemically determined. All the proteins and the long genetic strand attributed to the viruses would first have to be identified. Neither this, nor the isolation of such embedded particles and the biochemical characterisation of their composition appear in a single publication.
This refutes the claim that such images constitute viruses.

The second method used to photograph  alleged  viruses  is the simple and quick negative staining electron microscopy technique. To separate genuinely existing structures, such as phages and giant viruses from all other components (isolation), a standard technique is used called density gradient centrifugation.
By coating these particles with a metal-containing  substance,  the  presence,  appearance  and  purity  of these isolated structures becomes visible in the electron microscope and the underlying structures appear as shadows in  the  electron  beam. The  isolated  particles  made  visible by  negative  staining  are  then  biochemically  characterised.  When phages and giant viruses are isolated in this way, the complete, always identical, very long, identically composed nucleic  acids  are  always  found  and  the  result  of  the  biochemical characterisation is documented.

In the case of all particles that are passed off as viruses by means of negative staining, the following takes place. These particles  are  not  enriched,  purified  and  isolated  with  the density  gradient  centrifugation  intended  for  this  purpose. Instead,  through  simple  centrifugation,  they  are  sedimented  onto  the  bottom  of  the  centrifuge  tube  (pelletisation), after which they are viewed under an electron microscope.
To date, the composition of  such structures, declared to be viruses, has never been determined biochemically. All publications in which structures are passed off as viruses in the electron microscopy can be easily checked and verified, and the virologists themselves have simply and elegantly - without realising it - refuted their claim for the existence of viruses.

A  large  number  of  electron  micrographs  of  structures claimed as viruses are published. This conceals the fact that ALL of these images are only typical structures of dying cell cultures  or  laboratory-produced  protein-fat-soap  vesicles which have NEVER been photographed in humans/animals/plants or fluids from them.

Other researchers outside the field of virology refer to these same structures as either typical cellular components such as villi (amoeba-like protrusions with which cells cling to the substrate  and  move  around),  exosomes  or  other  particles that  are  of  the  size  assumed  to  be  viral  (they  are  referred to as virus-like particles). This provides more independent confirmation that the claims that viruses can be seen under the electron microscope are scientifically refuted.

Virologists  conduct  animal  experiments  to  allegedly  prove that the substances they work with are viruses and can cause disease. Every single publication in which such animal experiments have been carried out clearly shows that THE WAY in which  the  animals  are  treated  produces  exactly  the  symptoms that are claimed to be the effect of the virus. It is clear from every single one of these publications that no control experiments were carried out in which the animals were subjected to the same conditions with sterile material.

This reality refutes the virologists who claim that they have established the presence and effect of viruses in animal experiments.

In  order  to  end  the  Corona  crisis  and  turn  it  into  an  opportunity  for  all,  these  clear,  easily  comprehensible  and verifiable refutations of virology must be made public and impactful. One way to make these refutations powerful is to use the appropriate legal procedures against virologists in the courts and to make the results public. We will inform you via our Wissenschafft-Plus newsletter when we have reportable results to share.

I guarantee  that  anyone  who  wants  to  check  these  statements on any disease-causing virus will come to exactly the same conclusions if they are proficient in english and familiar with the methods.
For the time being, as long as the Corona crisis continues, my colleagues and I will only answer queries  regarding  so-called  Corona  and  measles  viruses. For enquiries about all other “viruses” during the Corona period, I refer to the articles on this that have appeared in the magazine WissenschafftPlus since 2003.

If you are also considering taking legal action, please bear in mind that the ruling in the measles virus trial, which was upheld by the highest court in Germany, has removed the basis for the entire field of virology.
As explained previously, the unintentional and inadvertent killing of cells in the laboratory was published as proof of the existence of so-called disease-causing  viruses  [translator’s  note,  please  read https://pubmedinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/propagation-in-tissue-cultures-of-cytopathogenic-agents-from-patients-with-measles.pdf].  It  was  judicially  determined  and is thus part of German jurisprudence, that the publication of the central method of virology (in 1954 [translator’s note, the previous linked paper]) no longer constitutes proof of the existence of a virus, as of the year 2016!

The  corona  crisis  has  improved  the  chance  that  the  verdict of the measles virus trial alone can turn the tide from the  good-evil  mindset  that  dominates  biology,  medicine, society  and  the  state  today.  
The  application  of  the  seven arguments listed above are enough to end the anticipated momentum of the global Corona hysteria and the profiteering with test procedures and vaccines that sustain it.
With regard  to  the  measles  virus  trial  and  in  general,  I  would refer  you  to  the  telegram  channel  Corona_Fakten.  There you’ll find an excellent summary of the significance of the measles virus trial along with many other extremely helpful texts.

My confidence that the Corona crisis will prove to be an opportunity for all is based on § 1 of the Infection Prevention Act,  abbreviated  to  ifSg.  in  §  1  ifSg  “Purpose  of  the  Act”, sentence  (2)  that  states:  “The  necessary  cooperation  and collaboration  of  federal,  state  and  local  authorities,  physicians,  veterinarians,  hospitals,  scientific  institutions  and other  stakeholders  shall  be  organised  and  supported  in accordance  with  the  respective  state  of  the  art  in  medical and epidemiological science and technology. The personal responsibility of the providers and managers of community facilities, food establishments, health care facilities and individuals in the prevention of communicable diseases shall be clarified and promoted.”

All Corona measures and ordinances, now also Corona laws, are exclusively and solely based on the Infection Protection Act (IfSg). However, since the mandatory provision in § 1 of the IfSg which states that “it must be designed and supported  be  designed  and  supported  in  accordance  with  the  respective state of medical and epidemiological science and technology” has been refuted by the published statements of virologists themselves and been proven to be anti-scientific, all corona measures, ordinances and laws lack the legal basis to be applied.

None of the institutions and managers of community facilities, food establishments, health care facilities addressed in § 1, sentence (2), nor any citizen may implement and tolerate Corona  measures  and  regulations  if  they  have  recognised and  can  prove  that  virologists  have  no  scientific  evidence for  the  existence  of  disease-causing  viruses,  as  they  have disproved  themselves  through  their  own  actions  and  publications.

As long as the obligation of scientificity in § 1 ifSg is maintained, it is possible with reference to § 1 ifSg to successfully present the evidence of the untenability, lawlessness, harmfulness  and  immorality  of  all  Corona  measures,  ordinances and laws before the courts. The majority of judges in germany are honest and conscientious, following the law. If it were otherwise, there would have been an open dictatorship in this country for a long time which would have established itself increasingly  visibly  by  means  of  pseudo-scientific  and  disproved arguments from the fields of virology and medicine.

Please bear the following in mind in your actions: the majority of the population believes in disease-causing viruses and in the positive effect of vaccines. To put it quite drastically: those who believe in the mistaken concept that cancer is the result of malignancy may also believe in “flying metastases”, aka viruses. The negative consequences of cancer diagnoses and their severe treatments, experienced directly and indirectly  by  almost  every  human  being,  are  deep-seated  and have an impact.

Please take into account in your explanations and activities that directly and indirectly experienced suffering alone has created  and  reinforced  people’s  perception  that  there  are dangerous and deadly diseases and also viruses.  Note that from  such  experiences  results  the  view  that  only  our  state and its specialists are able and permitted to deal with illness. By taking people’s perceptions into account you can avoid causing the opposite effect to that which you are trying to achieve. This is especially important when interacting with doctors, whom we all need.

I, for example, explain to every person who asks that there is  a  better  system  of  knowledge  that  scientifically  explains (in a positive sense) the processes that lead to illness and healing. Furthermore, that healing crises are part of this process and obstacles to healing can also occur.  However, in order to be able to accept this new view, it is a prerequisite that the previous system of explanation based on cell theory is recognised as having being disproved. The Corona crisis is a unique opportunity and a clear call to stand up for life and the three universal human ideals of freedom, equality and  fraternity,  i.e.  the  social  threefold  structure  of  human communities. (See the article in this issue of w+ 4/2020, “Die soziale Dreigliederung”).

This article is reprinted in our book “Corona – Weiter ins Chaos oder Chance für Alle?” [Corona - Further into Chaos or opportunity for All?] See book review on page 46 in this issue of w+.

“The Virus Misconception part 1” in the magazine WissenschafftPlus No. 1/2020

“The Virus Misconception part 2” in the magazine WissenschafftPlus No. 2/2020

“The Virus Misconception part 3"  in the magazine WissenschafftPlus No. 3/2020

This article and the article “Entwicklung von Medizin und Menschheit - wie geht es weiter?” [“Development of medicine and humanity - where do we go from here?”] in the magazine WissenschafftPlus No. 6/2015, can be found free on the internet on www. wissenschafftplus.de in “Wichtige texte” [“important texts”].

“Einführung in eine neue Sichtweise auf das Leben” [“Introduction to a new way of looking at life”] part i to iii can be found in issues no. 1, 2 and 3/2019 of WissenschafftPlus.

“Wasser  begreifen,  Leben  erkennen.  Pi-Wasser:  Mehr  als nur  energetisiertes  H2O”  
[“Understanding  water,  recognising life. Pi-Water: More than just energised H2O”]
WissenschafftPlus No. 6/2018. this article is freely available on our  website  www.wissenschafftplus.de  under  the  heading “Wichtige texte” [“important texts”]